Porovnání: Kumho PorTran CW51 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Continental VanContact Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810

Vyšší střední

Kumho

PorTran CW51

R14 – R17

VS

Premium

Bridgestone

Porovnat také s

Efficient Grip Performance 2

PremiumContact 6

Cinturato P7

Test profile

PorTran CW51

Turanza T005

VanContact Winter

Blizzak W810

Počet testů

1

33

2

1

Best position

#8

#1

#7

Průměrná pozice

8.0

4.1

1.0

7.0

Nejnovější test

2019

2025

2019

Dostupné velikosti

21

658

46

56

Na mokru

Kumho PorTran CW51

61%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

Continental VanContact Winter

94%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

51%

Výkon za mokra

Kumho PorTran CW51

58%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

Continental VanContact Winter

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

49%

Brzdění na mokru

Kumho PorTran CW51

49%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Continental VanContact Winter

94%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

40%

Zatáčení na mokru

Kumho PorTran CW51

72%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

85%

Continental VanContact Winter

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

61%

Ovladatelnost na mokru

Kumho PorTran CW51

46%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Continental VanContact Winter

95%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

34%

Aquaplaning – příčný

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

73%

Continental VanContact Winter

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Aquaplaning – podélný

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Continental VanContact Winter

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Na suchu

Kumho PorTran CW51

67%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Continental VanContact Winter

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Výkon na suchu

Kumho PorTran CW51

46%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Continental VanContact Winter

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

46%

Brzdění na suchu

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Continental VanContact Winter

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Chování při řízení na suchu

Kumho PorTran CW51

38%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

85%

Continental VanContact Winter

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

38%

Sníh

Kumho PorTran CW51

70%

Continental VanContact Winter

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Komfort

Kumho PorTran CW51

71%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

76%

Continental VanContact Winter

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

58%

Hluk v kabině

Kumho PorTran CW51

71%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Continental VanContact Winter

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Vnější hluk

Kumho PorTran CW51

71%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

62%

Continental VanContact Winter

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

44%

Led

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Continental VanContact Winter

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Náklady

Kumho PorTran CW51

73%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

81%

Continental VanContact Winter

43%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

73%

Počet najetých kilometrů

Kumho PorTran CW51

67%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

69%

Continental VanContact Winter

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Spotřeba paliva

Kumho PorTran CW51

84%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

86%

Continental VanContact Winter

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

84%

Rozměry a ceny

Porovnejte ceny ve všech dostupných rozměrech těchto pneumatik.

Porovnání: Kumho PorTran CW51 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Continental VanContact Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810

PorTran CW51

Turanza T005

VanContact Winter

Blizzak W810

Test profile

Na mokru

Na suchu

Sníh

Komfort

Led

Náklady

Rozměry a ceny

Přidat k porovnání