Porovnání: Linglong Sport Master vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs. Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

Rozpočet

Linglong

Sport Master

VS

Porovnat také s

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test profile

Sport Master

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Powerproof 2

P Zero (PZ5)

Počet testů

8

3

26

22

2

Best position

#1

#2

#1

#6

#1

Průměrná pozice

9.5

3.3

2.2

2.7

8.0

3.0

Nejnovější test

2026

Dostupné velikosti

113

60

66

253

91

17

Na mokru

Linglong Sport Master

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

85%

Nokian Powerproof 2

69%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

80%

Brzdění na mokru

Linglong Sport Master

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

87%

Nokian Powerproof 2

74%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

76%

Ovladatelnost na mokru

Linglong Sport Master

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

86%

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

64%

Aquaplaning – příčný

Linglong Sport Master

57%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

77%

Nokian Powerproof 2

86%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

100%

Aquaplaning – podélný

Linglong Sport Master

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

76%

Nokian Powerproof 2

42%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

93%

Zatáčení na mokru

Linglong Sport Master

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

86%

Na suchu

Linglong Sport Master

64%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

89%

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

92%

Brzdění na suchu

Linglong Sport Master

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

88%

Nokian Powerproof 2

69%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

88%

Ovladatelnost na suchu

Linglong Sport Master

53%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

88%

Nokian Powerproof 2

71%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

96%

Změna jízdního pruhu na suchu

Linglong Sport Master

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

90%

Nokian Powerproof 2

42%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

92%

Náklady

Linglong Sport Master

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

85%

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

77%

Valivý odpor

Linglong Sport Master

65%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

80%

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

77%

Cena/hodnota

Linglong Sport Master

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

94%

Počet najetých kilometrů

Linglong Sport Master

53%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

100%

Komfort

Linglong Sport Master

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

78%

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

87%

Vnější hluk

Linglong Sport Master

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

88%

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

74%

Komfort

Linglong Sport Master

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

77%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

100%

Rozměry a ceny

Porovnejte ceny ve všech dostupných rozměrech těchto pneumatik.

Porovnání: Linglong Sport Master vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs. Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

Sport Master

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Powerproof 2

P Zero (PZ5)

Test profile

Na mokru

Na suchu

Náklady

Komfort

Rozměry a ceny

Přidat k porovnání