26 Prodejci · 109,188+ Produkty

Porovnání: Viking FourTech Plus vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Testovací profil

Viking
FourTech Plus
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Počet testů
5
3
10
18
3
1
Nejlepší umístění
#9
#2
#2
#1
#2
#1
Průměrná pozice
12.0
3.3
6.0
6.1
3.7
1.0
Nejnovější test
2025
2026
2026
2024
2025
2025
Dostupné velikosti
24
40
104
47
34
64

Na mokru

Na mokru
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning – příčný
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Brzdění na mokru
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning – podélný
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Zatáčení na mokru
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Ovladatelnost na mokru
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Sníh

Sníh
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Náklady

Náklady
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Cena/hodnota
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Valivý odpor
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Počet najetých kilometrů
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Na suchu

Na suchu
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Ovladatelnost na suchu
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Brzdění na suchu
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Vnější hluk
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Rozměry a ceny

Porovnejte ceny ve všech dostupných rozměrech těchto pneumatik.

Přidat k porovnání

Oblíbené značky
Nové srovnání