26 Prodejci · 109,188+ Produkty

Porovnání: Viking FourTech Plus vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Testovací profil

Viking
FourTech Plus
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Počet testů
5
3
10
18
6
3
Nejlepší umístění
#9
#2
#2
#1
#3
#2
Průměrná pozice
12.0
3.3
6.0
6.1
4.7
3.7
Nejnovější test
2025
2026
2026
2024
2026
2025
Dostupné velikosti
24
40
104
47
146
34

Na mokru

Na mokru
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning – podélný
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Zatáčení na mokru
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Ovladatelnost na mokru
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning – příčný
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Brzdění na mokru
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Sníh

Sníh
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Náklady

Náklady
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Počet najetých kilometrů
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Cena/hodnota
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Valivý odpor
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Vnější hluk
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%

Na suchu

Na suchu
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Brzdění na suchu
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Ovladatelnost na suchu
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Rozměry a ceny

Porovnejte ceny ve všech dostupných rozměrech těchto pneumatik.

Přidat k porovnání

Oblíbené značky
Nové srovnání