Porovnání: Viking FourTech Plus vs. Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Rozpočet

Viking

FourTech Plus

VS

Porovnat také s

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testovací profil

FourTech Plus

Solmax 1

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Počet testů

5

1

4

3

5

3

Nejlepší umístění

#9

#8

#3

#2

#1

#2

Průměrná pozice

12.0

8.0

12.0

3.7

2.2

3.3

Nejnovější test

2025

2026

Dostupné velikosti

24

46

111

34

63

40

Na mokru

Viking FourTech Plus

77%

Goodride Solmax 1

49%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning – příčný

Viking FourTech Plus

92%

Goodride Solmax 1

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Brzdění na mokru

Viking FourTech Plus

74%

Goodride Solmax 1

35%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Aquaplaning – podélný

Viking FourTech Plus

85%

Goodride Solmax 1

53%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Zatáčení na mokru

Viking FourTech Plus

75%

Goodride Solmax 1

46%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Ovladatelnost na mokru

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

Goodride Solmax 1

51%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Sníh

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

Náklady

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Goodride Solmax 1

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Valivý odpor

Viking FourTech Plus

80%

Goodride Solmax 1

60%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Počet najetých kilometrů

Viking FourTech Plus

65%

Goodride Solmax 1

45%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Komfort

Viking FourTech Plus

69%

Goodride Solmax 1

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Vnější hluk

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Goodride Solmax 1

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Komfort

Viking FourTech Plus

66%

Goodride Solmax 1

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Na suchu

Viking FourTech Plus

64%

Goodride Solmax 1

54%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Brzdění na suchu

Viking FourTech Plus

53%

Goodride Solmax 1

56%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Ovladatelnost na suchu

Viking FourTech Plus

79%

Goodride Solmax 1

51%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Rozměry a ceny

Porovnejte ceny ve všech dostupných rozměrech těchto pneumatik.

Porovnání: Viking FourTech Plus vs. Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

FourTech Plus

Solmax 1

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testovací profil

Na mokru

Sníh

Náklady

Komfort

Na suchu

Rozměry a ceny

Přidat k porovnání