26 Prodejci · 109,188+ Produkty

Porovnání: Viking FourTech Plus vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Testovací profil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Počet testů
5
4
18
3
1
2
Nejlepší umístění
#9
#3
#1
#2
#1
#1
Průměrná pozice
12.0
12.0
6.1
3.3
1.0
1.0
Nejnovější test
2025
2025
2024
2026
2025
2025
Dostupné velikosti
24
111
47
40
64
23

Na mokru

Na mokru
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplaning – příčný
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Brzdění na mokru
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Aquaplaning – podélný
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Zatáčení na mokru
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Ovladatelnost na mokru
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%

Sníh

Sníh
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Na suchu

Na suchu
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Ovladatelnost na suchu
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Brzdění na suchu
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%

Náklady

Náklady
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Valivý odpor
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Počet najetých kilometrů
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Vnější hluk
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%

Rozměry a ceny

Porovnejte ceny ve všech dostupných rozměrech těchto pneumatik.

Přidat k porovnání

Oblíbené značky
Nové srovnání