26 obchodů · 109 188+ produktů

Porovnání: Viking Fourtech vs. Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Testovací profil

Viking
Fourtech
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Počet testů
5
13
29
24
Nejlepší umístění
#11
#6
#1
#1
Průměrná pozice
17.0
10.9
3.7
2.7
Nejnovější test
2021
2025
2025
2025
Dostupné velikosti
32
61
180
302

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Na mokru
Viking Fourtech
70%
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Brzdění na mokru
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Zatáčení na mokru
Viking Fourtech
55%
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Ovladatelnost na mokru
Viking Fourtech
59%
Firestone Multiseason 2
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Aquaplaning – příčný
Viking Fourtech
96%
Firestone Multiseason 2
48%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Aquaplaning – podélný
Viking Fourtech
77%
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Sníh
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Brzdění na sněhu
Viking Fourtech
82%
Firestone Multiseason 2
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Zatáčení na sněhu
Viking Fourtech
67%
Firestone Multiseason 2
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Ovladatelnost na sněhu
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
61%
Trakce na sněhu
Viking Fourtech
51%
Firestone Multiseason 2
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Náklady
Viking Fourtech
84%
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Valivý odpor
Viking Fourtech
96%
Firestone Multiseason 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Počet najetých kilometrů
Viking Fourtech
65%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Cena/hodnota
Viking Fourtech
77%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Firestone Multiseason 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Firestone Multiseason 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Vnější hluk
Viking Fourtech
76%
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Na suchu
Viking Fourtech
59%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Brzdění na suchu
Viking Fourtech
47%
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Ovladatelnost na suchu
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Rozměry a ceny

Porovnejte ceny ve všech dostupných rozměrech těchto pneumatik.

Přidat k porovnání

Oblíbené značky
Nové srovnání

TestPneumatik.eu

Zdarma — v App Store

ZÍSKAT

TestPneumatik.eu

Zdarma — v App Store

Porovnejte pneumatiky, přečtěte si výsledky testů a najděte nejlepší ceny — vše v jedné aplikaci.

Zobrazit v App Store